Increasing the Accuracy of Determining the Cardiothoracic Ratio with the Help of an Ensemble of Neural Networks

image_print
DOI
Journal Journal of Mechanical Engineering – Problemy Mashynobuduvannia
Publisher Anatolii Pidhornyi Institute for Mechanical Engineering Problems
National Academy of Science of Ukraine
ISSN  2709-2984 (Print), 2709-2992 (Online)
Issue Vol. 27, no. 2, 2024 (June)
Pages 54-60
Cited by J. of Mech. Eng., 2024, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 54-60

 

Authors

Vladyslav D. Koniukhov, Anatolii Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems of NAS of Ukraine (2/10, Komunalnykiv str., Kharkiv, 61046, Ukraine), e-mail: riggelllll@gmail.com, ORCID: 0009-0007-0256-1388

Serhii V. Ugrimov, Anatolii Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems of NAS of Ukraine (2/10, Komunalnykiv str., Kharkiv, 61046, Ukraine), e-mail: sugrimov@ipmach.kharkov.ua, ORCID: 0000-0002-0846-4067

 

Abstract

The cardiothoracic ratio is one of the main screening tools for heart health. Cardiothoracic ratio is usually measured manually by a cardiologist or radiologist. In the era of neural networks, which are currently developing very rapidly, we can help doctors automate and improve this process. The use of deep learning for image segmentation has proven itself as a tool that can significantly accelerate and improve the process of medical automation. In this paper, a comparative analysis of the use of several neural networks for the segmentation of the lungs and heart on X-ray images was carried out for further improvement of the automatic calculation of the cardiothoracic ratio. Using a sample of 10 test images, manual cardiothoracic ratio measurements and 7 automatic measurement options were performed. The average accuracy of the measurement of the cardiothoracic ratio of the best of the two neural networks is 93.80%, and the method that used the ensemble of networks obtained a result of 97.15%, with the help of the ensemble of neural networks it was possible to improve the ratio determination by 3.35%. The obtained results indicate that thanks to the use of an ensemble of neural networks, it was possible to improve the result of automatic measurement, and also testify to the effectiveness and prospects of using this method in the medical field.

 

Keywords: machine learning, neural networks, deep learning, image segmentation, medical image analysis.

 

Full text: Download in PDF

 

References

  1. Truszkiewicz, K, Poręba, R, & Gać, P. (2021). Radiological cardiothoracic ratio in evidence-based medicine. Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 9, article 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092016.
  2. Hada, Y. (1995). Cardiothoracic ratio. Journal of Cardiology, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 51–54.
  3. Li, W., Jia, F., & Hu, Q. (2015). Automatic segmentation of liver tumor in CT images with deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Computer and Communications, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 146–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2015.311023.
  4. Jaeger, S, Candemir, S, Antani ,S, Wáng, Y.-X. J., Lu, P.-X., & Thoma, G. (2014). Two public chest X-ray datasets for computer-aided screening of pulmonary diseases. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 475–477. http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.11.20.
  5. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N., Hornegger J., Wells W., Frangi A. (eds). Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.
  6. Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017). SegNet: A Deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2481–2495. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615.
  7. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015), May 7–9, 2015, San Diego, 13 p.
  8. Fletcher, S. & Islam, M. Z. (2018). Comparing sets of patterns with the Jaccard index. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 22, 17 p. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1538.

 

Received 22 April 2024

Published 30 June 2024