All articles are being reviewed.
The manuscripts submitted to the editorial board, after preliminary examination, undergo a single-blind peer review process to assess their compliance with the subject matter and requirements of the journal.
On the basis of the received reviews, the editor-in-chief decides whether to accept the manuscript for publication without revising, or the authors have the opportunity to revise the manuscript, taking into account the comments of the reviewers, and re-submit it. Otherwise, the manuscript is rejected. The decision taken is brought to the attention of the author indicated as the contact person.
The original manuscript is registered when the editorial office receives it by e-mail (registration date).
The editor-in-chief of the Journal or their deputy decide on the choice of reviewers according to the subject of the manuscript.
The materials of the manuscript are transmitted to the designated reviewers for the review to be performed.
The editor-in-chief makes a decision on the publication of an article, which is brought to the attention of the authors.
In case of a positive decision, the manuscript is transmitted to the editorial office to start preparations for publication.
In case of necessity to revise the manuscript, the reviews along with all the comments and wishes of the reviewers (without mentioning their surnames and contacts) are sent to the author.
In the case of rejection of the manuscript, a motivated notification is sent to the author, ensuring the anonymity of the reviewers.
In case of disagreement with the review, the author may send a motivated answer to the editorial board.
After they make corrections in the electronic version of the manuscript, taking into account the reviewers’ and editor’s comments, the authors re-submit the electronic version of the manuscript to the editorial office.
The revised version of the manuscript is then sent for re-reviewing.